A: The ISM of spiral galaxies consists largely of cold neutral and molecular gas (HI and H2).
B: The ISM of ellipticals consists largely of hot X-ray gas.How do we go from point A to point B?
- make stars (good! fixes central density problem)
- make star clusters (good! explains differences in SN)
- heat gas via shocks or starburst winds (good! explains X-ray halos)
Observations of mergers (Schweizer etal 1996) and "young ellipticals" (Brown etal 2000) reveal a relatively low current GC specific frequency (SN=0.7-1.4, compared to ~ 5 for "typical" ellipticals) -- could mergers produce ellipticals which have too few globular clusters?
Evolution:
Where do we go from here?Just wait -- the remnant will evolve with time...
Prevolution:
- X-ray halos: Stellar evolution and gas return will feed a hot halo (eg Sansom etal 2000).
- Globular Clusters: The remnant fades with time (but only raises SN ~ 2-3; Schweizer etal 1996; Brown etal 2000)
Our understanding of the details of mergers relies primarily on z~0 studies (both observational and theoretical). The things which merged to form ellipticals at higher redshift may well be different than the things we observe at z~0:
- different gas content
- different gas distributions
- different local/global stability properties
So far we have focused largely on starburst triggering and gas inflow. But how would these things affect merger properties?These mergers may have
- a larger fraction of baryons processed through a starburst: higher SN?
- more gas to fuel starburst and drive superwinds or more gas to be collisionally heated: more luminous X-ray halo?
- a higher ratio of global:central star formation: KDCs less common in old E's?
Question: why should ellipticals which form from different progenitors look the same?Question: why should ellipticals formed at z=0 look like ones formed at higher redshift?