From Mihos & Hernquist (1996) Thumbnail physics:
|
|
Comparing different models:
|
|
If present-day ellipticals formed from mergers at higher redshifts, the progenitors may have systematically different structural and gas properties compared to z=0 spirals
When did bulges form? When did disks? N-body (Steinmetz) and semi-analytic models (e.g., Kauffman and Baugh) suggest that bulges of luminous spirals are largely in place by z ~ 1 - 1.5. Observationally, there is some evidence for evolution in B:D ratio (e.g., Marleau and Simard 1998).
More globally unstable at high z? Easier to drive nuclear accretion/starbursts/AGN?
High redshift galaxies are also probably more gas-rich and perhaps more prone to local instabilities (e.g., Kauffmann 1996):
![]()
![]()
z=0
z=2.5
Collisions at high redshift may very easily drive extremely luminous disk-wide starbursts, perhaps explaining the very knotty appearance of many high-z interactions.
Could this deplete the galaxies of fuel needed to drive ULIRG-type nuclear starbursts?
Bunker etal 2000 high z galaxies
![]()