Obviously, globular clusters can't be older than the Universe. We measure the age of a globular cluster by measuring the main sequence turnoff in the color-magnitude diagram of GCs:By measuring the luminosity and color of the turnoff, and comparing to models of stellar evolution, we can determine the ages of the globular clusters. Typical numbers are 10-16 billion years (see, eg, the analysis by Chaboyer and Krauss 2003). M92 is a typical example: t=14.5 +/- 2.5 Gyr (Grundahl etal 2000).
Ages of Lambda=0 Universes H0 OmegaM t0 (Gyr) A 65 1 10 B 40 1 15 C 65 0.3 12 D 65 0.1 15 E 75 0.1 13 F 50 0.1 19.5 We can see from this table that some models are "ruled out":
The Cosmological Constant may be real
- it's extremely hard to envision an OmegaM=1 universe.
- it's extremely hard to envision a high H0 universe (ie H0 > 80)
Ages of H0=65 Universes OmegaM OmegaLambda t0 A 1 0 10 B 0.3 0 12 C 0.3 0.7 13.5 D 0.1 0.9 19.5
Now we need to introduce a few concepts. When we look at an object at a given redshift, we can define (in a model-dependent way):
from this we solve for t:

We also know how scale factor and redshift are
related:

Plugging in, we get

so the way we have defined things, lookback time can
be calculated this way:

so

or

analagous but messier equations exist for other
cosmologies
as well...

Recently, an elliptical galaxy was found at high redshift (z ~ 1.5) which looks to be at least 3.5 billion years old. How can this constrain cosmology? You tell me....