1917: Willem
de Sitter used general relativity to describe an expanding
universe.
Einstein favored a static model which neither expanded nor contracted,
by inserting an ad-hoc term he called the cosmological
constant.
1929: Hubble measures the expansion of the Universe

v=H0d,
where H0 = 72 km/s/Mpc is the
Hubble constant.
(Because of historic
uncertainty in the Hubble constant, astronomers
often define a parameter h=H0/100,
and write distance dependant results as (for example), d=200h-1
Mpc.)
Remember the redshift:

Using normal Doppler equation (v<<c), v=cz, and d=cz/H0.
But it is important to realize here that the cosmological redshift is not really due to galaxies moving through space at high velocities. Galaxies are actually "embedded" in space and space itself is expanding. The light emitted from the galaxies is "stretched" as it makes its way towards us, and we see it shifted to longer wavelengths.
Measuring distances in an expanding universe:
The distance between two objects can be defined as d = R(t) x r, whereGo back to the redshift. What does that tell us about the expansion?For two galaxies r only changes due to peculiar motion of the galaxies (ie due to gravity in a cluster, etc). The change in proper distance due to the expansion of space is entirely contained in R(t). We define R(now) = 1.
- d = proper distance
- R = dimensionless scale factor
- r = comoving coordinate

So if we observe a quasar at a redshift of z=3, at the time the light left the quasar, the universe was 1/4 its current size.
As z gets large, R gets small. At some point, R=0!
When did that happen?
Homer
solves the age of the Universe.
Let's see. Space is expanding in such a way that d=v/H0, then to get to a distace d moving at velocity v would take time t0=d/v=1/H0. So the inverse of the Hubble constant is a (rough) measure of the age. This is called the Hubble time.If H0 = 72 (km/s)/Mpc, this is ~ 72 (pc/Myr)/Mpc, which is 72x10-6 Mpc/Myr/Mpc = 7.2x10-5 Myr-1.
Then t0 = 1/H0 = 1.39x104 Myr = 13.9 billion years.
There's a pretty big assumption built into this -- what is it?